Skip to content
AG
Back to Blog

NY and California pension funds push back on SpaceX's governance

May 14, 2026·1 min read

Two of the largest public pension funds in the US — New York State Common Retirement Fund and CalPERS — are calling out SpaceX's control structure as "extreme." The complaint: Elon Musk reportedly wants supervoting shares that would lock in

Two of the largest public pension funds in the US — New York State Common Retirement Fund and CalPERS — are calling out SpaceX's control structure as "extreme." The complaint: Elon Musk reportedly wants supervoting shares that would lock in his control even as outside investors pour billions into the company at sky-high valuations.

This matters because SpaceX is still private, but it's huge. Pension funds invest indirectly through secondary deals and funds, which means teachers and firefighters in NY and CA are partial owners. They're saying: if we're paying up, we want at least basic accountability. Right now they get neither voting power nor real disclosures.

The broader pattern is familiar. Founders from Zuckerberg to Page to Musk have normalized dual-class structures, and late-stage private companies have pushed it further by skipping public markets entirely. Investors get the upside narrative; governance gets quietly deleted from the term sheet.

My take: pension funds finally pushing back is overdue, but SpaceX has no real pressure to listen as long as money keeps flowing in. The fix isn't a strongly-worded letter — it's writing "no supervoting, or no check" into the actual investment terms. source

About the author

Amar Gupta

Amar Gupta

Senior Frontend Developer — AI & MCP

I build production frontends in React, Next.js and TypeScript — and the AI and MCP tooling behind them. 7+ years shipping web applications, from data modelling through to the deployed interface.

📍 Delhi, India · Open to Full-time

Read next